Turkish vs Choctaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Turkish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Turks

Choctaw

Exceptional
Fair
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Choctaw Integration in Turkish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,358,360 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 30.2 Choctaw.
Turkish Integration in Choctaw Communities

Turkish vs Choctaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $35,999, a difference of 45.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $82,287, a difference of 43.2%), and median family income ($121,202 compared to $84,835, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $45,450, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $53,060, a difference of 28.2%).
Turkish vs Choctaw Income
Income MetricTurkishChoctaw
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,391
Tragic
$35,999
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$121,202
Tragic
$84,835
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$99,389
Tragic
$69,947
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,919
Tragic
$40,270
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$64,253
Tragic
$47,729
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,695
Tragic
$33,775
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,266
Tragic
$45,450
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$110,318
Tragic
$78,168
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,814
Tragic
$82,287
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$68,037
Tragic
$53,060
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
28.1%

Turkish vs Choctaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 61.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 58.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 24.4%).
Turkish vs Choctaw Poverty
Poverty MetricTurkishChoctaw
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
11.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
16.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
24.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
18.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
21.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
21.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Tragic
21.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
27.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
20.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.6%

Turkish vs Choctaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 39.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.2%).
Turkish vs Choctaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTurkishChoctaw
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Tragic
19.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%

Turkish vs Choctaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 5.7%).
Turkish vs Choctaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTurkishChoctaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
61.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.9%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.7%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Tragic
78.2%

Turkish vs Choctaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 37.3%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 34.4%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.6%), family households (63.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.3%).
Turkish vs Choctaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTurkishChoctaw
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Fair
46.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
36.9%

Turkish vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 48.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 24.7%).
Turkish vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTurkishChoctaw
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
92.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.3%
Exceptional
59.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
7.8%

Turkish vs Choctaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 92.2%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 84.4%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 80.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.020%).
Turkish vs Choctaw Education Level
Education Level MetricTurkishChoctaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Excellent
95.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Tragic
89.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.5%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.7%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
65.5%
Tragic
52.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Tragic
37.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
29.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
11.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
1.4%

Turkish vs Choctaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 72.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 70.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 34.8%).
Turkish vs Choctaw Disability
Disability MetricTurkishChoctaw
Disability
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
15.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
15.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
16.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
52.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
8.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.0%