Creek vs Choctaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Creek
Choctaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Creek
Choctaw
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Choctaw Integration in Creek Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,293,341 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.094% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 93.9 Choctaw.
Creek vs Choctaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $78,168, a difference of 4.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $82,287, a difference of 4.2%), and wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $45,450, a difference of 0.17%), median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $33,775, a difference of 1.0%), and per capita income ($35,546 compared to $35,999, a difference of 1.3%).
Income Metric | Creek | Choctaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,546 | Tragic $35,999 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,560 | Tragic $84,835 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,715 | Tragic $69,947 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,648 | Tragic $40,270 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,594 | Tragic $47,729 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,437 | Tragic $33,775 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,371 | Tragic $45,450 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $74,847 | Tragic $78,168 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $78,960 | Tragic $82,287 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,949 | Tragic $53,060 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 28.1% |
Creek vs Choctaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 8.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 0.16%), poverty (15.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.23%).
Poverty Metric | Creek | Choctaw |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 16.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 24.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 18.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 21.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 21.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 21.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 27.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 20.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Creek vs Choctaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.38%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.75%).
Unemployment Metric | Creek | Choctaw |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Creek vs Choctaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.65%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.35%).
Labor Participation Metric | Creek | Choctaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.3% | Tragic 61.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.1% | Tragic 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.1% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.7% | Tragic 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 80.4% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.0% | Tragic 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.7% | Tragic 78.2% |
Creek vs Choctaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.3%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.25%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.49%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.63%).
Family Structure Metric | Creek | Choctaw |
Family Households | Fair 64.2% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.3% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Poor 46.0% | Fair 46.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.6% | Tragic 36.9% |
Creek vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 8.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.050%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Creek | Choctaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.3% | Exceptional 59.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.9% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Creek vs Choctaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 10.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
Education Level Metric | Creek | Choctaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Excellent 95.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 89.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 87.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.2% | Tragic 52.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Tragic 37.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.9% | Tragic 29.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Creek vs Choctaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.8%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and hearing disability (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.030%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.57%).
Disability Metric | Creek | Choctaw |
Disability | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 15.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 15.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 16.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 52.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.4% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 8.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.0% |