Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,339,225 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Northern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.571. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.086% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Europe corresponds to an increase of 85.9 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,159 compared to $35,999, a difference of 50.4%), median family income ($121,840 compared to $84,835, a difference of 43.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,930 compared to $82,287, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,571 compared to $45,450, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,003 compared to $53,060, a difference of 30.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 58.6%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 57.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 10.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.1%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 32.6%), and births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 35.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 92.4%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 77.9%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 76.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 63.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 62.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 12.9%), disability age over 75 (45.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.4%).