Uruguayan vs Choctaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Choctaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Uruguayans
Choctaw
4,949
SOCIAL INDEX
47.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
188th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Choctaw Integration in Uruguayan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,195,023 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.761. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.041% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to a decrease of 40.6 Choctaw.
Uruguayan vs Choctaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,318 compared to $35,999, a difference of 23.1%), median household income ($84,691 compared to $69,947, a difference of 21.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $82,287, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $53,060, a difference of 11.4%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $47,729, a difference of 12.5%).
Income Metric | Uruguayan | Choctaw |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,318 | Tragic $35,999 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,656 | Tragic $84,835 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,691 | Tragic $69,947 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,190 | Tragic $40,270 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,680 | Tragic $47,729 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,228 | Tragic $33,775 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,465 | Tragic $45,450 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $93,631 | Tragic $78,168 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,660 | Tragic $82,287 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,090 | Tragic $53,060 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.2% | Tragic 28.1% |
Uruguayan vs Choctaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 42.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 37.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 15.1%).
Poverty Metric | Uruguayan | Choctaw |
Poverty | Average 12.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 11.6% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Fair 13.6% | Tragic 16.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.8% | Tragic 24.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.3% | Tragic 18.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 17.0% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.1% | Tragic 21.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Tragic 21.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.2% | Tragic 21.1% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.2% | Tragic 27.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 20.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.5% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.8% | Tragic 13.6% |
Uruguayan vs Choctaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 30.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Uruguayan | Choctaw |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.9% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Uruguayan vs Choctaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Uruguayan | Choctaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 61.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.9% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.1% | Tragic 78.2% |
Uruguayan vs Choctaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.3%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.59%), family households (64.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and married-couple households (45.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Uruguayan | Choctaw |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.5% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.6% | Fair 46.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.1% | Tragic 36.9% |
Uruguayan vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 43.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 38.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 29.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Uruguayan | Choctaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.8% | Exceptional 92.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.7% | Exceptional 59.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Uruguayan vs Choctaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.4%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 38.4%), and bachelor's degree (38.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.8% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (88.2% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.43%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.50%).
Education Level Metric | Uruguayan | Choctaw |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.2% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Excellent 95.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.9% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.4% | Tragic 89.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.2% | Tragic 87.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 85.0% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.2% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.8% | Tragic 52.3% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.5% | Tragic 37.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.4% | Tragic 29.4% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.3% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.4% |
Uruguayan vs Choctaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 64.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 60.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 23.4%).
Disability Metric | Uruguayan | Choctaw |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 15.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Average 5.6% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 16.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 52.7% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 3.0% |