Argentinean vs Choctaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Argentinean
Choctaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Argentineans
Choctaw
8,055
SOCIAL INDEX
78.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
90th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Choctaw Integration in Argentinean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,961,242 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.086. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 8.3 Choctaw.
Argentinean vs Choctaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $35,999, a difference of 38.5%), median household income ($93,960 compared to $69,947, a difference of 34.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $82,287, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $45,450, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $53,060, a difference of 23.0%).
Income Metric | Argentinean | Choctaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,862 | Tragic $35,999 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,665 | Tragic $84,835 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,960 | Tragic $69,947 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,399 | Tragic $40,270 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,117 | Tragic $47,729 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,952 | Tragic $33,775 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,154 | Tragic $45,450 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $103,111 | Tragic $78,168 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $110,103 | Tragic $82,287 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,246 | Tragic $53,060 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 28.1% |
Argentinean vs Choctaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 53.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 44.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.8%).
Poverty Metric | Argentinean | Choctaw |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Excellent 8.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Excellent 12.8% | Tragic 16.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.4% | Tragic 24.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 18.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 21.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 21.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 21.1% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 27.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 20.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.2% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.4% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 13.6% |
Argentinean vs Choctaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 35.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.2%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Argentinean | Choctaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.1% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 19.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Fair 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.9% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Argentinean vs Choctaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Argentinean | Choctaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 61.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Tragic 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.3% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.1% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 78.2% |
Argentinean vs Choctaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.5%), births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 23.0%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.16%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.38%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Argentinean | Choctaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Fair 46.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 30.0% | Tragic 36.9% |
Argentinean vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 21.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Argentinean | Choctaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 92.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.5% | Exceptional 59.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Argentinean vs Choctaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 83.6%), master's degree (18.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 64.8%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.7% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%).
Education Level Metric | Argentinean | Choctaw |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.3% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.5% | Exceptional 96.2% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.8% | Excellent 95.1% |
10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.6% | Tragic 89.8% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.5% | Tragic 87.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.7% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.4% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.2% | Tragic 52.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.2% | Tragic 37.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 29.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.2% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Argentinean vs Choctaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 74.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 66.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 11.1%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 31.3%).
Disability Metric | Argentinean | Choctaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 15.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 15.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 16.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 52.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 8.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 3.0% |