French Canadian vs Choctaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

French Canadian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

French Canadians

Choctaw

Average
Fair
5,542
SOCIAL INDEX
52.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
175th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Choctaw Integration in French Canadian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,230,836 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 22.5 Choctaw.
French Canadian Integration in Choctaw Communities

French Canadian vs Choctaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $82,287, a difference of 20.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $78,168, a difference of 19.9%), and median family income ($101,634 compared to $84,835, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.24%), householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $53,060, a difference of 9.3%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $33,775, a difference of 13.8%).
French Canadian vs Choctaw Income
Income MetricFrench CanadianChoctaw
Per Capita Income
Fair
$43,003
Tragic
$35,999
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,634
Tragic
$84,835
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,810
Tragic
$69,947
Median Earnings
Fair
$46,026
Tragic
$40,270
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,722
Tragic
$47,729
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,436
Tragic
$33,775
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,672
Tragic
$45,450
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,694
Tragic
$78,168
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$99,093
Tragic
$82,287
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,975
Tragic
$53,060
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
28.1%

French Canadian vs Choctaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 48.1%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 42.8%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.7%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.5%).
French Canadian vs Choctaw Poverty
Poverty MetricFrench CanadianChoctaw
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
11.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
14.4%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
16.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Tragic
24.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
18.1%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.6%
Tragic
21.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
21.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Tragic
21.1%
Single Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Females
Tragic
22.2%
Tragic
27.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
20.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Tragic
13.6%

French Canadian vs Choctaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 26.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 16.6%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.2%).
French Canadian vs Choctaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFrench CanadianChoctaw
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
19.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.2%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.3%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%

French Canadian vs Choctaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 4.5%).
French Canadian vs Choctaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFrench CanadianChoctaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.0%
Tragic
61.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.2%
Tragic
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.1%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.3%
Tragic
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Poor
82.5%
Tragic
78.2%

French Canadian vs Choctaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.8%).
French Canadian vs Choctaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFrench CanadianChoctaw
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.07
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.0%
Fair
46.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
14.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.4%
Tragic
36.9%

French Canadian vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.68%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.060%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.68%).
French Canadian vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFrench CanadianChoctaw
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.9%
Exceptional
59.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.8%

French Canadian vs Choctaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 27.7%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.3%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
French Canadian vs Choctaw Education Level
Education Level MetricFrench CanadianChoctaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Excellent
95.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
89.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.2%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.8%
Tragic
52.3%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.9%
Tragic
37.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.6%
Tragic
29.4%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.1%
Tragic
11.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.4%

French Canadian vs Choctaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 44.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 0.30%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.1%).
French Canadian vs Choctaw Disability
Disability MetricFrench CanadianChoctaw
Disability
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
15.4%
Males
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
15.4%
Females
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
16.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.0%
Tragic
52.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.1%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
8.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.0%