Chickasaw vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,078,757 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.159% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 158.7 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.6%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $33,775, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $45,450, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($70,005 compared to $69,947, a difference of 0.080%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $82,287, a difference of 0.11%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $47,729, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (19.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 9.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 0.89%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 1.6%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.84%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.020%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.44%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.6%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.31%).