Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Choctaw

Good
Fair
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Choctaw Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,620,881 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 6.1 Choctaw.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Choctaw Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $35,999, a difference of 28.4%), median household income ($88,388 compared to $69,947, a difference of 26.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $82,287, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 9.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $45,450, a difference of 15.4%), and median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $47,729, a difference of 17.2%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileChoctaw
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Tragic
$35,999
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Tragic
$84,835
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Tragic
$69,947
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Tragic
$40,270
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Tragic
$47,729
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Tragic
$33,775
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Tragic
$45,450
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Tragic
$78,168
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Tragic
$82,287
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Tragic
$53,060
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Tragic
28.1%

Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 42.8%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 40.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 18.5%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileChoctaw
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Average
8.9%
Tragic
11.6%
Males
Average
11.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Females
Average
13.3%
Tragic
16.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
24.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Tragic
21.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
21.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
21.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
27.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
20.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.6%

Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 33.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileChoctaw
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Average
5.2%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
19.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.9%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileChoctaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
61.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
78.2%

Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.7%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 18.3%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.32%), family households (64.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.49%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.67%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileChoctaw
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Fair
46.3%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
14.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Tragic
36.9%

Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.2%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileChoctaw
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Exceptional
92.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Exceptional
59.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Exceptional
7.8%

Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 63.1%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 52.0%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.43%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileChoctaw
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Excellent
95.1%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
89.8%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Tragic
52.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
37.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Tragic
29.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
11.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 62.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 62.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.8%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileChoctaw
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
15.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
16.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
52.7%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%