Sri Lankan vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 243,959,621 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Sri Lankan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sri Lankans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sri Lankans corresponds to an increase of 31.6 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,093 compared to $69,947, a difference of 33.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,270 compared to $82,287, a difference of 31.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,960 compared to $78,168, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 9.0%), median male earnings ($56,136 compared to $47,729, a difference of 17.6%), and median earnings ($48,040 compared to $40,270, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 52.0%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 48.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 47.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 28.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 27.4%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 24.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.3%), average family size (3.35 compared to 3.21, a difference of 4.3%), and family households (67.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.7%), no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.23%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 68.2%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 33.5%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.39%), high school diploma (87.0% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.95%), and ged/equivalency (84.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 61.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age over 75 (48.5% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 25.4%).