Immigrants from Grenada vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,816,047 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.091. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 13.3 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 74.0%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $33,775, a difference of 24.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $45,450, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $82,287, a difference of 4.0%), householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $53,060, a difference of 4.6%), and median family income ($89,249 compared to $84,835, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 42.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 39.1%), and receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.070%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 35.7%), male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 49.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.4%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 22.6%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (62.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.21, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 375.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 184.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 153.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 47.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 106.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 153.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 52.0%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 26.6%), and bachelor's degree (35.0% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (59.1% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.48%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 107.6%), disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 98.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 68.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.0%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 9.9%).