Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 260,066,895 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($91,541 compared to $69,947, a difference of 30.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,109 compared to $82,287, a difference of 28.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,283 compared to $78,168, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 13.5%), median male earnings ($55,241 compared to $47,729, a difference of 15.7%), and median earnings ($47,671 compared to $40,270, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 49.9%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 48.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 36.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.8%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 21.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (67.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.88%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 59.8%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 26.6%), and bachelor's degree (36.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.6% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.20%), high school diploma (87.2% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and 11th grade (90.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.3%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 56.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 8.2%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 19.9%).