Immigrants from Uruguay vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,153,579 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.610. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.147% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 146.9 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,997 compared to $35,999, a difference of 22.2%), median household income ($82,560 compared to $69,947, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $82,287, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $53,060, a difference of 7.4%), median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $47,729, a difference of 10.7%), and median earnings ($45,682 compared to $40,270, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 43.2%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 33.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 8.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.050%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 12.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.46%), family households (63.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 51.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 34.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 41.3%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 35.7%), and bachelor's degree (37.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.21%), high school diploma (87.6% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and 11th grade (91.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 65.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 58.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.7%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.6%).