Armenian vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,685,635 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Armenian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.405. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Armenians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Armenians corresponds to a decrease of 3.0 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Armenian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,287 compared to $35,999, a difference of 34.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,248 compared to $78,168, a difference of 32.1%), and median household income ($91,807 compared to $69,947, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 13.6%), householder income over 65 years ($61,656 compared to $53,060, a difference of 16.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,179 compared to $45,450, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Armenian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (18.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 48.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 48.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Armenian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 35.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Armenian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Armenian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.2% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 40.7%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 34.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.81%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (46.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Armenian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 65.4%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 52.2%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.7% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.72%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 81.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 66.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 64.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 5.3%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and self-care disability (3.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 12.6%).