Native Hawaiian vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,087,221 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.041. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 2.4 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $53,060, a difference of 33.9%), median household income ($89,919 compared to $69,947, a difference of 28.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $82,287, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $47,729, a difference of 9.6%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $40,270, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 45.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 40.2%), and family poverty (8.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 6.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.9%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.4%), currently married (47.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (68.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.21%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.8%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and associate's degree (43.1% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 50.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 40.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 9.0%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 18.5%).