Lebanese vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,140,483 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Lebanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.547. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lebanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.132% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lebanese corresponds to an increase of 132.3 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,840 compared to $35,999, a difference of 27.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,734 compared to $82,287, a difference of 27.3%), and median family income ($107,086 compared to $84,835, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.97%), householder income under 25 years ($50,355 compared to $45,450, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,287 compared to $53,060, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 36.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 34.9%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.5%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 24.8%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.63%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 22.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.88%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 55.7%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 49.5%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.080%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 52.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 45.8%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.5%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 23.6%).