Fijian vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,038,451 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.357. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.164% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 163.8 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 22.8%), householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $45,450, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $53,060, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,193 compared to $40,270, a difference of 0.19%), per capita income ($36,690 compared to $35,999, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $78,168, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 32.2%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 4.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 49.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 14.3%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.050%), married-couple households (46.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and family households (65.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.31%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.9%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 28.1%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 57.1%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 38.0%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 11.8%).