Immigrants from Cambodia vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,006,320 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.517. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to an increase of 28.1 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 10.7%), median household income ($83,304 compared to $76,383, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,580 compared to $62,330, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,450 compared to $51,713, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($38,833 compared to $37,905, a difference of 2.5%), and median family income ($97,222 compared to $94,429, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 37.9%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 26.7%), and single father poverty (14.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (14.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.85%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 81.8%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 74.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 71.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 23.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 26.3%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.5% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.32%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 52.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 1.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 138.5%), bachelor's degree (34.2% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and associate's degree (42.3% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (61.5% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 0.79%), nursery school (96.5% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 80.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 42.7%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.9%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.8%).