Australian vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,035,397 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.677. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.420% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 419.9 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $39,163, a difference of 33.0%), median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $49,748, a difference of 26.4%), and median household income ($96,490 compared to $76,383, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $51,713, a difference of 3.9%), householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $62,330, a difference of 7.3%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 52.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 49.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.8%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 95.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 95.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 93.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 19.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 55.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 31.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 54.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 23.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 2.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 59.0%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 54.7%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.1% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.18%), 10th grade (95.1% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 68.2%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 53.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.9%).