Hawaiian vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,425,995 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 3.6 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($84,729 compared to $76,383, a difference of 10.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $90,951, a difference of 8.6%), and median family income ($98,869 compared to $94,429, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,403 compared to $39,163, a difference of 0.61%), median earnings ($43,673 compared to $43,393, a difference of 0.65%), and median female earnings ($37,497 compared to $37,905, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 36.0%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.3%), single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and female poverty (13.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 86.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 81.6%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 72.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 26.9%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.2%), currently married (46.6% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 94.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.3%), and associate's degree (40.9% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.16%), ged/equivalency (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 53.9%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 37.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.030%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.6%).