Tohono O'odham vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Alaskan Athabascans

Tragic
Fair
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,085,592 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 13.2 Alaskan Athabascans.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Alaskan Athabascan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($72,193 compared to $94,429, a difference of 30.8%), per capita income ($30,256 compared to $39,163, a difference of 29.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($69,068 compared to $88,446, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $37,905, a difference of 14.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $51,713, a difference of 14.3%), and wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 16.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Alaskan Athabascan Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamAlaskan Athabascan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Tragic
$39,163
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Tragic
$94,429
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Tragic
$76,383
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Tragic
$43,393
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Tragic
$49,748
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$37,905
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Fair
$51,713
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Tragic
$88,446
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Tragic
$90,951
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Excellent
$62,330
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Average
25.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 102.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 96.4%), and married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 85.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 21.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (24.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 29.5%), and single male poverty (21.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 33.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamAlaskan Athabascan
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
13.6%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
23.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
30.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Good
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
14.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Alaskan Athabascan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 68.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (8.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 39.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and male unemployment (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Alaskan Athabascan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamAlaskan Athabascan
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
7.7%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Fair
17.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
8.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
8.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
11.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
6.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Alaskan Athabascan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 44.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 15.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 8.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Alaskan Athabascan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamAlaskan Athabascan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Tragic
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
45.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
82.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
81.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
81.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Tragic
81.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 32.2%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.0%), and currently married (36.8% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.53 compared to 3.27, a difference of 8.2%), and family households (67.1% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 8.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamAlaskan Athabascan
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
61.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
43.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
44.6%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
37.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Alaskan Athabascan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 21.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 16.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.15%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 10.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Alaskan Athabascan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamAlaskan Athabascan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
86.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Average
55.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
8.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Alaskan Athabascan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.7%), professional degree (2.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 33.7%), and master's degree (9.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.93%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.94%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.96%).
Tohono O'odham vs Alaskan Athabascan Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamAlaskan Athabascan
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.8%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.7%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.7%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Fair
85.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Tragic
61.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
36.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 29.5%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (14.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 2.1%), disability (14.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamAlaskan Athabascan
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
14.9%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
9.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Tragic
32.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Tragic
54.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Poor
2.5%