Crow vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,387,907 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.500. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.715% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 714.8 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 35.2%), householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $62,330, a difference of 26.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $88,446, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $37,905, a difference of 7.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $51,713, a difference of 10.0%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $43,393, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 67.4%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 60.1%), and married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 9.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 139.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 136.7%), and female unemployment (12.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 98.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (10.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.82 compared to 3.27, a difference of 17.1%), currently married (40.4% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.72%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father households (3.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 41.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 0.99%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 20.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 16.1%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.35%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and nursery school (99.7% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.8%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.23%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.5%).