Blackfeet vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,939,075 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.910. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.253% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 3,252.5 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,029 compared to $62,330, a difference of 15.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,531 compared to $88,446, a difference of 8.5%), and median family income ($88,717 compared to $94,429, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 2.1%), median male earnings ($48,402 compared to $49,748, a difference of 2.8%), and median earnings ($41,822 compared to $43,393, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 18.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 15.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.010%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 70.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 67.5%), and male unemployment (6.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and female unemployment (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 24.9%), family households (63.6% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.28%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 62.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 2.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 14.0%), and associate's degree (40.3% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (61.1% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 47.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 21.6%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (13.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.69%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.8%).