Chickasaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Alaskan Athabascan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Alaskan Athabascans
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,188,731 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.698% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 697.7 Alaskan Athabascans.
Chickasaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $62,330, a difference of 16.0%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,713, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $88,446, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $49,748, a difference of 4.0%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $43,393, a difference of 6.7%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Alaskan Athabascan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $39,163 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $94,429 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $76,383 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $43,393 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $49,748 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $37,905 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Fair $51,713 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $88,446 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $90,951 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Excellent $62,330 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Average 25.8% |
Chickasaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.8%), single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.010%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Alaskan Athabascan |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 22.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 19.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 17.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 17.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 18.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 23.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 30.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 99.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 93.9%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 89.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Alaskan Athabascan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 9.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Fair 17.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 10.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 8.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 8.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 11.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Chickasaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 17.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.51%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Alaskan Athabascan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 45.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 81.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 81.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.8% |
Chickasaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 22.7%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.4%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Alaskan Athabascan |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 61.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 43.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 44.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 37.7% |
Chickasaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 98.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Alaskan Athabascan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 86.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Average 55.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Chickasaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.3% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Alaskan Athabascan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Fair 85.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 61.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 53.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 36.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Poor 1.7% |
Chickasaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.0%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), male disability (15.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.5%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Alaskan Athabascan |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 14.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 32.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 54.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 5.3% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Poor 2.5% |