Fijian vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,783,031 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 11.8 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 12.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $88,446, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $62,330, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($74,205 compared to $76,383, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $51,713, a difference of 3.2%), and per capita income ($36,690 compared to $39,163, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 20.3%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.46%), family poverty (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.69%), and poverty (13.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 124.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 115.8%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 88.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 16.9%), single father households (3.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and family households (65.9% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.36 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 64.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 69.3%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 52.0%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (28.7% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 50.8%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 31.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.51%), ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and female disability (13.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 6.3%).