Osage vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,044,376 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 90.0 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $51,713, a difference of 13.0%), householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $62,330, a difference of 11.9%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $37,905, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,568 compared to $39,163, a difference of 1.0%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $49,748, a difference of 1.1%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $76,383, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 25.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (13.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.060%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 102.2%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 84.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 76.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.78%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 36.5%), births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 17.6%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.33%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 79.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 3.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 19.8%), bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and associate's degree (41.5% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.47%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.0%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.90%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability (14.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 2.0%).