Immigrants from England vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,286,949 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 32.6 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,844 compared to $39,163, a difference of 24.7%), median household income ($92,098 compared to $76,383, a difference of 20.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,446 compared to $90,951, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $51,713, a difference of 0.20%), householder income over 65 years ($65,715 compared to $62,330, a difference of 5.4%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 47.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 46.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 6.6%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 92.5%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 91.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 86.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 18.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 54.1%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.4%), and births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.3%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.27, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (64.4% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 79.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 5.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 47.3%), bachelor's degree (41.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 43.8%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.8% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.080%), high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 59.2%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 46.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.1%).