Immigrants from Ukraine vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,485,510 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Ukraine communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.543. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ukraine within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.288% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ukraine corresponds to an increase of 287.9 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,134 compared to $39,163, a difference of 22.9%), median male earnings ($59,820 compared to $49,748, a difference of 20.3%), and median household income ($91,124 compared to $76,383, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 0.93%), householder income over 65 years ($61,163 compared to $62,330, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,447 compared to $51,713, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 55.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 42.7%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.8%), single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 86.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 79.9%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 79.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 29.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 67.5%), births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 38.5%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (64.2% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 45.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 25.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.9% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.88%), no vehicles in household (14.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.9% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.6%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 47.2%), and bachelor's degree (41.5% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.48%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.94%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 78.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 51.2%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.8%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.0%).