Immigrants from Lithuania vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,131,689 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.200. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.417% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 416.8 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,361 compared to $39,163, a difference of 31.1%), median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $49,748, a difference of 27.3%), and median household income ($96,836 compared to $76,383, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $62,330, a difference of 6.0%), householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $51,713, a difference of 6.4%), and wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 72.2%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 58.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.7%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and single mother poverty (25.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 95.8%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 90.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 85.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 21.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 79.0%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 39.2%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.9%), family households (63.9% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.27, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 58.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 43.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 59.8%), bachelor's degree (44.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 54.8%), and professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.1% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.23%), 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and high school diploma (91.3% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 82.0%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 64.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 64.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 10.3%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.4%).