Immigrants from Uruguay vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,027,893 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.993. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.391% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 390.8 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,997 compared to $39,163, a difference of 12.3%), householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $62,330, a difference of 9.4%), and median household income ($82,560 compared to $76,383, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $51,713, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $37,905, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,171 compared to $88,446, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 39.3%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (14.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 2.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 88.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 85.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 77.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 31.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 39.1%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.67%), currently married (45.0% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 49.3%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 30.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 58.7%), bachelor's degree (37.8% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 31.0%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 93.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 52.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.7%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.6%).