Arapaho vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,569,499 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.024% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 1,024.2 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $88,446, a difference of 23.4%), per capita income ($32,345 compared to $39,163, a difference of 21.1%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $37,905, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $62,330, a difference of 5.0%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and median household income ($67,965 compared to $76,383, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.2%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 32.6%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 4.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 109.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (16.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 99.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 82.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (7.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 21.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 24.9%), single father households (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.8%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households (66.5% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 112.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 20.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 47.0%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 43.6%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 34.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 32.8%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.5%).