Creek vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,796,583 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.248. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.062% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 62.1 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $62,330, a difference of 20.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $88,446, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $90,951, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 5.3%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $49,748, a difference of 6.8%), and median earnings ($39,648 compared to $43,393, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 23.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 22.4%), and single mother poverty (36.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.25%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 82.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 81.4%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 75.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 29.7%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 100.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.18%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.4%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 22.9%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (28.9% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 0.13%), 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.0%), hearing disability (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and male disability (15.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 4.2%).