Immigrants from Israel vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,736,357 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.209. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 47.5 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $39,163, a difference of 46.5%), median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $49,748, a difference of 38.1%), and median household income ($104,090 compared to $76,383, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $51,713, a difference of 8.1%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $62,330, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 59.3%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 46.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.49%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 90.8%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 82.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 79.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 48.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 88.0%), births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 50.0%), and single mother households (5.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.67%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (63.4% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 68.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 40.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.15%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 106.5%), master's degree (22.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 95.7%), and doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 77.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.27%), high school diploma (90.5% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 101.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 82.6%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 72.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.6%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 17.6%).