Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,017,308 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.993. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.131% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 130.7 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($85,054 compared to $76,383, a difference of 11.4%), per capita income ($43,464 compared to $39,163, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,141 compared to $90,951, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $51,713, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $37,905, a difference of 3.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,848 compared to $62,330, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 41.4%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.84%), single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and female poverty (13.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 84.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 82.3%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 79.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 27.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 40.7%), births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 13.1%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.10%), family households with children (28.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 52.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 0.46%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 56.6%), bachelor's degree (36.9% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 28.1%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.99%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 85.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 50.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 9.9%).