Immigrants from Grenada vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,801,319 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.311. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.959% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 1,958.7 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 59.3%), householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $62,330, a difference of 22.8%), and median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $37,905, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,311 compared to $88,446, a difference of 0.15%), median household income ($76,517 compared to $76,383, a difference of 0.18%), and median male earnings ($50,279 compared to $49,748, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 49.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 33.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.24%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 65.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 51.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 78.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 17.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 68.5%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and currently married (39.1% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 195.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 141.5%), and no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 140.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 37.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 92.5%), and no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 140.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 88.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and bachelor's degree (35.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 142.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 77.2%), and disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.18%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.2%).