Immigrants from Malaysia vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,528,946 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 9.5 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,983 compared to $39,163, a difference of 27.6%), median household income ($96,292 compared to $76,383, a difference of 26.1%), and median male earnings ($62,121 compared to $49,748, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $51,713, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $62,330, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 54.2%), receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 41.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 99.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 94.5%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 89.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 31.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 65.1%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 37.9%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (64.0% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 36.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 20.0%), and no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.57%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 63.5%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.6%), and bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 94.5%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 63.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.8%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 16.3%).