Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,895,210 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to a decrease of 5.9 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 15.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $51,713, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $88,446, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($43,416 compared to $43,393, a difference of 0.050%), median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $37,905, a difference of 0.16%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,293 compared to $90,951, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 29.0%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 26.9%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.21%), male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.56%), and family poverty (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 90.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 82.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 80.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 35.6%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.9% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 0.12%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.43%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 53.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 39.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 3.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 64.0%), bachelor's degree (36.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 26.9%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 92.8%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 43.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.5%).