Immigrants from Honduras vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,628,354 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Honduras communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Honduras within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Honduras corresponds to an increase of 23.0 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($51,888 compared to $62,330, a difference of 20.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,328 compared to $88,446, a difference of 14.4%), and median family income ($83,618 compared to $94,429, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($36,665 compared to $39,163, a difference of 6.8%), median household income ($71,452 compared to $76,383, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,267 compared to $51,713, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 36.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (22.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 30.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (22.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 3.2%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 76.9%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 74.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 68.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and female unemployment (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 28.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.4% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 20.3%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and currently married (42.2% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.36 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 33.4%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 32.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 116.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 25.8%), and high school diploma (82.5% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.6%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 91.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 48.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.0%).