Immigrants from Bahamas vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,279,364 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Bahamas communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bahamas within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bahamas corresponds to an increase of 6.2 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 22.4%), householder income over 65 years ($53,174 compared to $62,330, a difference of 17.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,910 compared to $88,446, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($37,193 compared to $39,163, a difference of 5.3%), median household income ($71,349 compared to $76,383, a difference of 7.1%), and median female earnings ($35,027 compared to $37,905, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 23.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.010%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 75.6%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 71.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 65.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.0%), female unemployment (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 27.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 39.0%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.080%), family households (63.6% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 57.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 53.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 52.4%), bachelor's degree (33.3% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and associate's degree (42.1% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (61.1% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 0.12%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 84.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 43.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.3%).