Immigrants from Barbados vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,846,480 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Barbados communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Barbados within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Barbados corresponds to an increase of 57.3 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (17.8% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 44.5%), householder income over 65 years ($53,766 compared to $62,330, a difference of 15.9%), and median female earnings ($41,685 compared to $37,905, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,687 compared to $88,446, a difference of 0.27%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,394 compared to $90,951, a difference of 1.7%), and median male earnings ($50,795 compared to $49,748, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 39.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 32.0%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.23%), male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 56.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 54.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 55.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 55.8%), married-couple households (39.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and currently married (40.3% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.8%), family households (63.2% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 123.9%), no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 89.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 87.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 21.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.8% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 54.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 87.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 81.3%), master's degree (14.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.4%), and bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 1.0%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 125.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 63.6%), and disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.0%), ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.7%).