Immigrants from Ecuador vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,478,035 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.629. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 19.137% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 19,136.9 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $62,330, a difference of 15.4%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and per capita income ($41,195 compared to $39,163, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $90,951, a difference of 0.56%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $88,446, a difference of 1.4%), and median male earnings ($50,474 compared to $49,748, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 36.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 30.5%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.1%), receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 58.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 58.4%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%), female unemployment (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 45.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 39.9%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.44%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 90.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 63.8%), and no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 12.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 36.3%), and no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 52.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 110.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 21.8%), and bachelor's degree (34.7% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.4% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 0.020%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 115.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 64.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.4%).