Immigrants from Korea vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,506,410 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Korea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.237. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Korea within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Korea corresponds to a decrease of 7.5 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($102,962 compared to $76,383, a difference of 34.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,243 compared to $90,951, a difference of 33.3%), and per capita income ($51,671 compared to $39,163, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,716 compared to $51,713, a difference of 7.7%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,696 compared to $62,330, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 71.4%), receiving food stamps (8.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 69.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 64.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 98.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 98.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 98.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 33.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 66.6%), births to unmarried women (26.3% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 43.6%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (66.0% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 62.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 19.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 4.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 70.4%), bachelor's degree (47.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 63.0%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (90.5% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and 11th grade (93.3% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 94.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 75.3%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 72.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.6%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 17.8%).