Ugandan vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,752,172 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.994. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.338% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to an increase of 338.2 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,047 compared to $39,163, a difference of 15.0%), median household income ($87,557 compared to $76,383, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,472 compared to $90,951, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,923 compared to $51,713, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($61,177 compared to $62,330, a difference of 1.9%), and wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 42.9%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 30.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 79.9%), male unemployment (5.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 78.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 74.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 45.7%), births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 25.4%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.7% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 0.18%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and married-couple households (43.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 41.1%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 36.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 3.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 48.1%), bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 41.7%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.80%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.81%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 85.5%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 51.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.0%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.2%).