Choctaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Choctaw
Alaskan Athabascan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Choctaw
Alaskan Athabascans
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Choctaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,828,382 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.455% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 455.0 Alaskan Athabascans.
Choctaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $62,330, a difference of 17.5%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $51,713, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $88,446, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $49,748, a difference of 4.2%), median earnings ($40,270 compared to $43,393, a difference of 7.7%), and per capita income ($35,999 compared to $39,163, a difference of 8.8%).
Income Metric | Choctaw | Alaskan Athabascan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,999 | Tragic $39,163 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,835 | Tragic $94,429 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,947 | Tragic $76,383 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,270 | Tragic $43,393 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,729 | Tragic $49,748 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,775 | Tragic $37,905 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,450 | Fair $51,713 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $78,168 | Tragic $88,446 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,287 | Tragic $90,951 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,060 | Excellent $62,330 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Average 25.8% |
Choctaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 21.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.8%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
Poverty Metric | Choctaw | Alaskan Athabascan |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 13.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.3% | Tragic 22.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 19.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.5% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 17.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Tragic 17.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Tragic 18.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 23.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 18.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Tragic 30.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Tragic 13.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Choctaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 81.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 76.1%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 74.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Choctaw | Alaskan Athabascan |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 9.8% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Fair 17.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Tragic 11.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 10.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 8.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 8.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Tragic 11.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Choctaw | Alaskan Athabascan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.5% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.4% | Tragic 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 45.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Exceptional 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.0% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Tragic 81.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.5% | Tragic 81.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.2% | Tragic 81.8% |
Choctaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 24.4%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Choctaw | Alaskan Athabascan |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 61.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Tragic 43.6% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Tragic 44.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.9% | Tragic 37.7% |
Choctaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 97.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Choctaw | Alaskan Athabascan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.2% | Tragic 86.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.3% | Average 55.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Choctaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.6%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 18.6%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.55%).
Education Level Metric | Choctaw | Alaskan Athabascan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Exceptional 97.3% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 95.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.8% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Fair 85.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Tragic 61.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.3% | Tragic 53.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.8% | Tragic 36.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 11.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Poor 1.7% |
Choctaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.1%), ambulatory disability (8.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 20.1%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 2.4%), male disability (15.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.4%).
Disability Metric | Choctaw | Alaskan Athabascan |
Disability | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 14.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 14.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 13.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 32.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.7% | Tragic 54.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 5.3% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Poor 2.5% |