Immigrants from Guatemala vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,354,298 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $62,330, a difference of 15.5%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,341 compared to $88,446, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $51,713, a difference of 0.52%), median household income ($75,123 compared to $76,383, a difference of 1.7%), and per capita income ($37,550 compared to $39,163, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 30.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.25%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and single female poverty (24.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 73.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 72.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 67.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 28.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 12.8%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 0.63%), married-couple households (42.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 39.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 18.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 3.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 144.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 23.5%), and high school diploma (81.4% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.48%), nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 91.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 50.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.82%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 9.9%).