Ghanaian vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,541,311 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to an increase of 47.3 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 15.4%), median household income ($83,582 compared to $76,383, a difference of 9.4%), and per capita income ($42,164 compared to $39,163, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $51,713, a difference of 1.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $88,446, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,043 compared to $62,330, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 32.9%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 21.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.84%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.91%), and family poverty (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 71.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 67.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and female unemployment (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 27.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 39.5%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.62%), family households (63.5% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and married-couple households (42.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 53.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 34.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.8%), no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 74.5%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 34.2%), and bachelor's degree (38.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 108.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 43.6%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.3%).