Central American Indian vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,211,053 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.606. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.174% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 174.2 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,232 compared to $62,330, a difference of 17.1%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 13.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,355 compared to $88,446, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($74,847 compared to $76,383, a difference of 2.1%), per capita income ($37,699 compared to $39,163, a difference of 3.9%), and median earnings ($41,474 compared to $43,393, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 42.2%), married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 36.8%), and family poverty (13.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 0.51%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and single male poverty (17.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 63.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 60.2%), and male unemployment (6.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.5%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 32.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 26.6%), family households (65.2% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.25%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.8%), no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.89%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 94.1%), bachelor's degree (32.5% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.5% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 63.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 36.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.1%), female disability (13.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and ambulatory disability (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.3%).