Romanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Romanian
Alaskan Athabascan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Romanians
Alaskan Athabascans
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Romanian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,931,737 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 11.2 Alaskan Athabascans.
Romanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,445 compared to $39,163, a difference of 23.7%), median male earnings ($60,063 compared to $49,748, a difference of 20.7%), and median household income ($91,994 compared to $76,383, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $62,330, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $51,713, a difference of 3.7%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 8.5%).
Income Metric | Romanian | Alaskan Athabascan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $48,445 | Tragic $39,163 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $111,243 | Tragic $94,429 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,994 | Tragic $76,383 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,244 | Tragic $43,393 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,063 | Tragic $49,748 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,663 | Tragic $37,905 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,632 | Fair $51,713 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $102,544 | Tragic $88,446 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $108,609 | Tragic $90,951 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,142 | Excellent $62,330 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Average 25.8% |
Romanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 49.1%), receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 40.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.3%), single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.3%).
Poverty Metric | Romanian | Alaskan Athabascan |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.6% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 10.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 22.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 19.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 17.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 17.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 18.3% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.6% | Tragic 23.6% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 18.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 30.3% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Romanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 93.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 91.6%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 91.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Romanian | Alaskan Athabascan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 9.8% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Fair 17.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Tragic 11.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 10.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 8.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 8.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Tragic 11.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Romanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Romanian | Alaskan Athabascan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Fair 65.0% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.8% | Tragic 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.5% | Exceptional 45.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.5% | Exceptional 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 81.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.5% | Tragic 81.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 81.8% |
Romanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 59.1%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 31.2%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.090%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (64.5% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Romanian | Alaskan Athabascan |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Tragic 61.8% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 43.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 44.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 37.7% |
Romanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 42.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 30.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 0.52%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 13.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Romanian | Alaskan Athabascan |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Tragic 86.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.5% | Average 55.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Romanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 48.4%), bachelor's degree (41.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 44.3%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.8% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.14%), high school diploma (90.7% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.32%).
Education Level Metric | Romanian | Alaskan Athabascan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 97.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Exceptional 95.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.5% | Fair 85.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.2% | Tragic 61.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.4% | Tragic 53.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.7% | Tragic 36.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.6% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.2% | Tragic 11.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Poor 1.7% |
Romanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 69.8%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 52.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.0%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.8%).
Disability Metric | Romanian | Alaskan Athabascan |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 14.4% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 14.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 13.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.6% | Tragic 9.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 32.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 54.0% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.1% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 5.3% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Poor 2.5% |