Comanche vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,268,092 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $62,330, a difference of 13.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $51,713, a difference of 8.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $88,446, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($38,088 compared to $39,163, a difference of 2.8%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $49,748, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.52%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 80.9%), male unemployment (5.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 69.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 66.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 19.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 33.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.21%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.42%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 52.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 2.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.6%), bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and associate's degree (39.9% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (61.4% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 0.66%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.78%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.6%), female disability (14.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability (14.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 2.3%).