Immigrants from Germany vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,421,836 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Germany communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.467. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Germany within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.225% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Germany corresponds to an increase of 224.9 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Germany and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,751 compared to $39,163, a difference of 16.8%), median male earnings ($56,542 compared to $49,748, a difference of 13.7%), and median household income ($86,764 compared to $76,383, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,544 compared to $62,330, a difference of 0.34%), householder income under 25 years ($51,190 compared to $51,713, a difference of 1.0%), and median female earnings ($39,603 compared to $37,905, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Germany and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 37.4%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 36.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and single father poverty (16.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Germany and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 91.2%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 89.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 83.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Germany and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Germany and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 48.7%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and births to unmarried women (32.8% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.1%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.27, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (64.3% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Germany and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 78.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 19.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 4.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Germany and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 36.4%), bachelor's degree (38.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 33.9%), and associate's degree (47.1% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.28%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Germany and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 53.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 38.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.74%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.7%).