Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Alaskan Athabascan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Alaskan Athabascans
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,394,334 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.694. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 23.1 Alaskan Athabascans.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Alaskan Athabascan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 12.8%), householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $62,330, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $51,713, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($94,472 compared to $94,429, a difference of 0.040%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $37,905, a difference of 0.32%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $90,951, a difference of 0.48%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,827 | Tragic $39,163 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $94,472 | Tragic $94,429 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $78,682 | Tragic $76,383 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $43,998 | Tragic $43,393 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,298 | Tragic $49,748 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,028 | Tragic $37,905 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $48,749 | Fair $51,713 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $86,736 | Tragic $88,446 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,385 | Tragic $90,951 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $57,114 | Excellent $62,330 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.8% | Average 25.8% |
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 25.9%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 22.7%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.71%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Poverty | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.6% |
| Families | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 10.1% |
| Males | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 12.8% |
| Females | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 14.4% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 22.5% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 19.1% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 21.8% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Tragic 17.5% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 17.6% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 18.3% |
| Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
| Single Females | Tragic 22.6% | Tragic 23.6% |
| Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 18.1% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 30.3% |
| Married Couples | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.1% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.3% | Good 10.6% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Alaskan Athabascan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 93.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 89.9%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 88.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 15.2%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 7.7% |
| Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 9.8% |
| Females | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
| Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 12.2% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Fair 17.7% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 11.6% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 8.6% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 8.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 8.4% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.4% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 11.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.1% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.5% | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Alaskan Athabascan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Alaskan Athabascan |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.3% | Poor 64.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 76.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.0% | Exceptional 45.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.3% | Exceptional 79.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 82.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 81.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Tragic 81.8% |
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 39.3%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.56%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.78%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Family Households | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 61.8% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Good 27.6% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.4% | Tragic 43.6% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Exceptional 3.27 |
| Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 44.3% | Tragic 44.6% |
| Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 32.9% | Tragic 37.7% |
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Alaskan Athabascan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 49.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 29.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 2.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 16.6%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Alaskan Athabascan |
| No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.7% | Tragic 86.0% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.9% | Average 55.2% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Exceptional 21.9% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Alaskan Athabascan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 114.5%), bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 23.1%), and associate's degree (43.7% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Alaskan Athabascan |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.5% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.7% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.7% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 97.3% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 95.4% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 90.4% | Exceptional 93.9% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 92.3% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 86.7% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.0% | Fair 85.3% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.5% | Tragic 61.0% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.6% | Tragic 53.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.7% | Tragic 36.5% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.5% | Tragic 28.8% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 11.6% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Tragic 3.8% |
| Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Poor 1.7% |
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 81.3%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.7%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 12.2%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Disability | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 14.4% |
| Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 14.9% |
| Females | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 13.9% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Average 5.6% | Tragic 6.3% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 9.4% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 15.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Tragic 32.4% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Tragic 54.0% |
| Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 3.1% |
| Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 17.6% |
| Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
| Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Poor 2.5% |